Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Chinese Physician ; (12): 175-179, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-445822

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the effect of levamlodipine intervention in diabetic nephropathy patients which accompanied with hypertension, using the technology of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of functional magnetic resonance (fMRI).Methods A controlled prospective method was taken , and fifty diabetic nephropathy ( phase III) patients which accompanied with hypertension were randomized assigned to two groups of A ( n =26) and B ( n =24).Levamlodipine (2.5 mg qd) was taken by patients of group A and amlodipine (5 mg qd) was taken by patients of group B for 24 weeks, respectively.Two groups both took angiotensinⅡreceptor blockers (ARBs) as the first line antithypertensive agents , their urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER), serum creatinine (sCr), cystatin C (Cys C) , and DWI scanning were detected before and after intervention .The levels of UAER, apparent diffusion coeffi-cient (ADC) value were compared between two groups before and after intervention .During the 24th week, two groups'adverse reac-tion to the medicines and the levels of blood pressure were recorded in each follow-up visit.Results The levels of UAER, systolic blood pressure(SBP), and diastolic blood pressure(DBP) were Significantly lower in group A after 24-week intervention compared to baseline [42.5 (25.3~91.0)μg/min vs 49.2(29.7~96.8)μg/min,(112.6 ±6.4)mmHg vs (135.3 ±7.6)mmHg, (71.4 ± 10.7)mmHg vs (80.3 ±11.6)mmHg, P 0.05).Group A had a better improvement of SBP (ΔSBP) and ADC (ΔADC) after inter-vention compared to group B ( P =0.02,0.01, respectively).The overall adverse reaction incidence was 15.4%(4/26) in group A and 41.7%(10/24)in group B, respectively (χ2 =4.27, P =0.0387).Conclusions For the diabetic nephropathy (phase III) pa-tients accompanied with hypertension , levamlodipine likely showed better effects on reducing comprehensive blood pressure and UAER , improving renal microcirculation , with less overall adverse reaction compared to amlodipine .

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL